The LEGO King logo

Head-to-head

LEGO Icons Ghostbusters Ecto-1 vs LEGO Icons The Lord of the Rings: Rivendell

Both built. Both reviewed. Here's how they actually compare on the things that matter.

By the numbers

The spec sheet.

Metric LEGO Icons Ghostbusters Ecto-1 LEGO Icons The Lord of the Rings: Rivendell
Rating 5/5 5/5
Pieces 2,352 6,167WINS
MSRP $199.99WINS $499.99
Price per piece $0.09 $0.08WINS
Verdict Must buy Must buy
Best for Ghostbusters fans, classic-car enthusiasts, and Icons collectors expanding their vehicle fleet. Lord of the Rings fans, fantasy builders, and serious LEGO Icons collectors with substantial display space.

Pros & cons

What I actually noticed.

LEGO Icons Ghostbusters Ecto-1

Pros

  • Iconic 1959 Cadillac Ecto-1 silhouette with movie-accurate proportions
  • Working sirens (visual rotation, not lit)
  • Equipment bay with proton packs, ghost trap, and PKE meter
  • Opening doors, hood, and trunk for full interior access
  • Roof-mounted equipment is removable for transport-mode display

Cons

  • No included minifig (it's a vehicle, not a vignette)
  • Some sticker work on the side panels and windows
  • Size demands a wider shelf than the [Land Rover Defender](/reviews/land-rover)

LEGO Icons The Lord of the Rings: Rivendell

Pros

  • 6,167 pieces — one of the largest single LEGO Icons sets ever made
  • Five sub-buildings, plus the Council of Elrond gazebo
  • 15 minifigures including all 9 members of the Fellowship
  • Waterfall, river, and full elven-valley landscape detail
  • The Shards of Narsil display alone is worth the build effort

Cons

  • Footprint is enormous — 72cm × 39cm — measure before ordering
  • $500 commitment matches a UCS Star Wars flagship
  • Build is 26+ hours — serious time investment

Made up your mind?

Pick a retailer.

LEGO Icons Ghostbusters Ecto-1

$199.99

Full review →

LEGO Icons The Lord of the Rings: Rivendell

$499.99

Full review →

Comparison generated from our individual reviews. Pros, cons, and ratings come from full hands-on builds — see each review for the complete take.